Federal prosecutor: Claims will be addressed in court
07/07/05
Leslie MarshallRINGGOLD — An attorney claims a police informant used in Operation Meth Merchant has tainted the federal drug sting because he misidentified suspects.
“The informant ... was utilized ... throughout Operation Meth Merchant,” said Ken Poston in a prepared statement to media.
According to police records, the informant was used to make a vast majority of cases in the sweeping investigation last month, which led to dozens of arrests across northwest Georgia.
“It is time for the United States government to do the right thing and acknowledge the inadequacies of the purported eyewitness identifications made by this undercover informant, without concern of what this admission may do to other cases in Operation Meth Merchant,” Poston said in the statement.
“The government should investigate the promises made to this informant as an incentive for his reckless identification of suspects,” he said.
David E. Nahmias, U.S. Attorney for Georgia’s Northern District, declined Thursday to comment in detail on the allegations.
"We consider all such claims carefully, but we will address them with defense counsel and in court," Nahmias said.
CLICK HERE: Comment on this story.
Details of mistaken identities
Poston said one of his clients, Malvika Patel of Cleveland, Tenn., who is accused of selling meth-making ingredients to an informant during Operation Meth Merchant, was picking up one of her children at a LaPetie Academy in Cleveland, Tenn., nearly an hour away when the alleged sale took place.
“Mrs. Patel regularly picked him (Veeren Patel) up at our school at approximately 2 p.m. every day,” said Faye Cooper, a LaPetie employee of 17 years, in a written statement. “Our computer records indicate that on the day in question she was here picking him up.”
“It would have been impossible for her to have been in both places,” Poston said.
The illegal transaction is alleged to have occurred at Tobacco for Less, a convenience store on LaFayette Road in Fort Oglethorpe, on April 22, 2004.
“She had never even been to the Fort Oglethorpe convenience store where she is now accused of working as a cashier and accused of knowingly selling the components of methamphetamine with the intentions of helping the informant manufacture the illegal substance,” Poston said.
Catoosa County Sheriff Phil Summers said he could make no specific comments about Poston’s claims.
"This is being handled by the federal law enforcement, by the U.S. Attorney’s office, and I'm not really privileged to what is going on in the investigation,” Summers said. “I couldn't really make a comment because I don't really know anything about it.
"I assume that if Mr. Poston feels that he has an issue, he will file that claim and it will be thoroughly investigated and of course handled by the U.S. Attorney's office in federal court,” Summers said.
“It's very unusual for an attorney to go to the news media to fight his battles,” he added. “I would think the appropriate place would be in the court system, and that is where we plan on handling our cases — through the court system and not through the news media."
Dhiren Patel, an officer for Saishree Inc, the corporation under which Tobacco for Less operates, said in a sworn statement that Malvika was never employed at the store and that he had never seen her at the store.
Poston said he has filed for a dismissal of the charges against his client.
“There is so much reasonable doubt on this case I cannot imagine it going forward,” he said. “We are making a demand of the government to release this indictment at whatever the cost to their other cases because there is nothing more important than an innocent person being spared the ridicule and the fear of what she is facing right now.
“We decided, after giving the government reasonable time … we needed these hard questions asked on a more open level,” he said.
Poston also said that that the same informant, apparently a white male, “made an even more glaring mistake” by misidentifying Malvika’s husband, Chirag, as the man who sold him meth-making ingredients on Dec. 21, 2004, at Tobacco for Less.
“Chirag Patel was in India attending a relative’s wedding on the date carefully noted by the government that the informant claims he dealt with Mr. Patel,” Poston said. “Mr. Patel’s passport proves his exit and re-entry dates. He was in India.”
Chirag Patel was not officially arrested during Operation Meth Merchant, an 18-month federal investigation that culminated on June 3 with 49 arrests at convenience stores in five northwest Georgia counties, including Walker, Catoosa, Dade, Whitfield and Floyd.
While Chirag was at the Whitfield County jail trying to have his wife released, authorities handcuffed him for 30-40 minutes, he said.
“After 40 minutes they released me and said ‘you are not the person we are looking for,’” Chirag said.
Malvika Patel was in jail from Friday, June 3, to late Monday, June 6. “I told my children that I was on a business trip. I couldn’t tell them about jail,” Malvika said.
“I cried in front of (police), telling them my wife had never been to that store,” Chirag said.
Chirag owns three convenience stores, two in Tennessee and one in Cumming, Ga., none of which were involved in Operation Meth Merchant.
“When the police came to pick her up, I explained to them I have enough convenience stores, so why would she work for someone else?” Chirag said.
Dhiren Patel is not related to Chirag or Malvika, Poston said. Patel is a common Indian surname.
Prosecutors say the suspects, who either owned or worked at the stores, sold meth-making ingredients to the informants after being told how the ingredients were to be used. It is a federal felony to knowingly sell products intended for manufacturing meth.
Some lawyers have charged that Operation Meth Merchant is a clear case of ethnic profiling. Of the 49 people arrested, 43 were of Indian descent.
Other misidentifications possible?Poston said the informant might have made other misidentifications.
“A possible and likely motive for the government continuing to prosecute (Malvika Chirag Patel) with such weak and questionable identification issues is that to admit the informant was in error in this case would conceivably bring into question and jeopardize other purported identifications made by the same informant-witness, in this and other indicted cases,” Poston said.
Besides Operation Meth Merchant, the informant has been used in a number of cases in Georgia and Tennessee, according to police records. The informant, who was paid, has been convicted in the past on charges of theft and forgery.
According to police records, the investigation used more than a dozen informants, including a number with criminal drug backgrounds.
The attorney said the informant was given two chances to identify the person he made the drug sale with at Tobacco for Less. On both occasions, he mistakenly said Malvika Patel was the seller, Poston said.
He said the informant identified his client in a procedure commonly called “show-up,” in which “a single photo of a single individual is shown to an eyewitness.”
“The photo was not carefully arrayed among photos of other Indian women, nor was it placed among photos of any other women of any race or culture,” Poston said.
“An entire science has evolved concerning the danger of this procedure,” he said. “It is … well established that a witness has a harder time accurately identifying a person not of his own race or culture.”